Classical Liberal Institute launched at conference on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Mario Rizzo, associate professor of economics and co-director of the Classical Liberal Institute, with Professor Richard Epstein, the institute's director

On September 20, the daylong conference “The Future of Fannie and Freddie,” co-sponsored by the Classical Liberal Institute and the NYU Journal of Law & Business, featured experts on law, finance, and economics examining the challenges to investment in the government-sponsored entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Four separate panels focused on the reorganization of Fannie and Freddie, recent litigation surrounding the Treasury Department’s decision to “wind down” the two entities and the legal issues involved, and economic policy and future prospects for Fannie and Freddie in light of proposed House and Senate legislation.

The event also served as the launch of NYU Law’s Classical Liberal Institute (CLI), a new center studying core conceptions of limited government and private property in a wide range of modern contexts including political and corporate governance, taxation, takings, intellectual property, and different forms of regulation. The CLI will host the Hayek Lecture (in cooperation with the NYU Journal of Law & Liberty) in October as well as an ongoing series of student lunches with Law School faculty discussing their work in the CLI’s areas of academic focus. Future CLI conferences are planned, including one in February 2014 on The Classical Liberal Constitution, an upcoming book by Richard Epstein, Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law and the director of the new institute, who gave opening remarks at the “Future of Fannie and Freddie” conference along with Dean Trevor Morrison.

Panel with Epstein, attorneys Steven Menashi and Randall Guynn, and Judge Arthur Gonzalez (LL.M. '90)

Epstein also participated in the day’s third panel, “Conservatorship and the Takings Clause.” In his remarks, he focused on whether the 2008 and 2012 reorganizations of Fannie and Freddie, along with other related actions, were contrary to the takings and due process clauses of the Constitution. The key issues he discussed included how to determine solvency when an entity has both positive and negative relationships with the government, whether the fact that the government’s 2008 action was a conservatorship and not a receivership had significant bearing, and how to characterize the government’s deal modification in 2012.

Other conference participants included Barry Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business, and Judge Arthur Gonzalez (LL.M. ’90), a Senior Fellow at the Law School, who served as panelists. Professor Troy McKenzie ’00 moderated a panel on the reorganization of Fannie and Freddie.

Watch the full video of the panel "Conservatorship and the Takings Clause" (1 hr, 27 min):

Posted on September 30, 2013