- Home
- Centers and Institutes
- Information Law Institute
- Research
- AI and Agency Law
AI and Agency Law
AI is now a part of everyday life, and “AI agents” operate autonomously in complex domains. Predating these artificial agents by hundreds of years, agency law governs the relationship between a principal and their trusted agent in many domains, including health, finance, legal services, and business management. According to agency law, agents owe fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to their principals. We research how AI systems can be compliant with these duties in contexts where they already exist. We also research how expanded fiduciary duties can address longstanding problems with the digital economy, such as conflicts of interests that arise with platforms, and incomplete contracting. This work is both actionable today with current implementations of AI, and a way to manage AI alignment in the long term to forestall catastrophic risks.
Institutionalizing Fiduciary AI Standards
We are documenting the variety of institutional arrangements that are used to standardize and enforce fiduciary responsibilities currently, and analyzing which of these arrangements is best suited to the realities of AI. Special attention will be paid to AI pipelines and the limits of regulating opaque and complex systems. What interventions can be made, at what stage in the development and deployment process, and by whom, for standardization to be effective?
Fiduciary Data Intermediary AI Design
Anticipating new architectures for fiduciary web services, as well as EU rules establishing fiduciary duties for data intermediaries, we apply computational economics techniques to guide how fiduciary duties apply to AI systems with multiple principals and interactions with third parties.
Fiduciary AI and the Incompleteness of Consent
Consider one root of the rationale for fiduciary AI: that human users cannot meaningfully consent to a contract with an AI performing tasks beyond their comprehension. By mathematically clarifying this root problem, we will both solidify the case for fiduciary AI and enumerate the powers needed by a regulator to adequately enforce agency duties.