Scholarship

Lawyering faculty members bring not only diverse, exceptional practice experiences to the Lawyering Program but also outstanding scholarly works, interests, and potential. During a Lawyering faculty member’s two to three years at NYU, the Lawyering Program and NYU School of Law provide support for the ongoing development of scholarship.

Institutional support includes budgets for research, conferences, and research assistants; collaboration with the Academic Careers Program; and access to the many colloquia, practice groups, and workshops at NYU School of Law. Lawyering faculty members are also invited and encouraged to attend regularly scheduled faculty workshops and lunches.

The Lawyering Program coordinates the Lawyering Scholarship Colloquium, a weekly forum for Lawyering faculty to review and critique new scholarship. The colloquium is an invaluable tool for helping participants develop research ideas, prepare articles for submission, and perfect job talks. Participation is open to all Lawyering faculty members as well as other junior scholars in the NYU Law community. This year’s LSC co-chairs are Haiyun Damon-Feng, Michael Goodyear, and Elise Maizel.

Publications by recent and current Lawyering faculty include:

  • Anna Arons, The Empty Promise of the Fourth Amendment in the Family Regulation System, 11 Wash. U.L. Rev. (forthcoming 2023)
  • Anna Arons, Thompson v. Clark and the 'Reasonable' Policing of Marginalized Families, N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change (forthcoming 2023)
  • Anna Arons, Book Review: Wendy A. Bach, Prosecuting Poverty, Criminalizing Care, 3 J.L. & Pol. Econ. 419 (2022)
  • Ashley Binetti Armstrong, You Shall Not Pass! How the Dublin System Fueled Fortress Europe, 20 Chic. J. Int'l L.​ 2 (2020)
  • Ashley Binetti Armstrong, Small Teaching, Big Impact, 19 LEGAL COMM. & RHETORIC: JALWD __ (forthcoming)
  • Edith Beerdsen, Discovery Culture, 57 Georgia L. Rev. (2022)
  • Edith Beerdsen, Litigation Science after the Knowledge Crisis, 106 Cornell L. Rev. 529 (2021)
  • Colleen Campbell, Medical Violence, Obstetric Racism, and the Limits of Informed Consent for Black Women, 26 Mich. J. Race & L. 47 (2021)
  • Tyler Rose Clemons, Coercive Ideology, Maryland Law Review (forthcoming 2024)
  • Sandeep Singh Dhaliwal, Investing in Abolition, 112 Georgetown L.J. (forthcoming 2023)
  • Mindy Nunez Duffourc & Dominick S. Giovanniello, The Autonomous AI Physician: Medical Ethics and Legal Liability in AI, LAW & BEYOND (Henrique Sousa Antunes & Arlindo Oliveira eds., Springer, forthcoming)
  • Seth Endo, Contracting for Confidential Discovery, 53 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1249 (2020)
  • Haiyun Damon-Feng, Administrative Reliance, 73 Duke L.J. (forthcoming)
  • Haiyun Damon-Feng, NIMBYism at the Border, Harv. L. Rev. Blog ( Mar. 6, 2023)
  • Jonathan F. Harris, Socioeconomic Duress in Employment Contracting, 42 Compar. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. __ (forthcoming) (invited)
  • Jonathan F. Harris, Unconscionability in Contracting for Worker Training, 72 Ala. L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2020) (reviewed in JOTWELL by Miriam A. Cherry)
  • Jonathan F. Harris, Conditional Workforce Training Contracts, 72 Ala. L. Rev. __ (2020)
  • Jonathan F. Harris, Is There a Right to Job Quality? Reenvisioning Workforce Development (with Livia Liam), 11 Calif. L. Rev. Online339 (2020)
  • J. Benton Heath, The New National Security Challenge to the Economic Order, 129 Yale L.J. 1020 (2020)
  • Christopher Jaeger, Predicting Variance in the Endowment Effect, 41 Evolution & Human Behavior ___ (2020) (with Owen D. Jones, Sarah F. Brosnan, & Daniel T. Levin)
  • Christopher Jaeger, The Power of Sequence: A Quantum Perspective on Legal Decision Making, in THEORIES OF CHOICE: THE SOCIAL SCIENCE AND THE LAW OF DECISION MAKING (Stefan Grundmann & Philipp Hacker eds., Oxford University Press, (2021) (with Jennifer S. Trueblood)
  • Christopher Jaeger, The Empirical Reasonable Person, 72 Alabama Law Review ___ (2021)
  • Christopher Jaeger, Predicting Variation in Endowment Effect Magnitudes, 41 EVOLUTION & HUM. BEHAV. 253 (2020) (with Owen D. Jones, Sarah Fr. Brosnan, & Daniel T. Levin)
  • Christopher Jaeger, The Power of Sequence: A Quantum Perspective on Legal Decision Making, in THEORIES OF CHOICE: THE SOCIAL SCIENCE AND THE LAW OF DECISION MAKING (Stefan Grundmann & Philipp Hacker eds., Oxford University Press, 2020) (with Jennifer S. Trueblood)
  • Brandon Johnson, The Accountability-Accessibility Disconnect, 58 WAKE FOREST L. REV.___ (forthcoming 2023)
  • Rachael Liebert, Trauma and Blameworthines in the Criminal Legal System, 18 STAN. J. C.R. & C.L. __ (2022)

  • Shirley Lin, Bargaining for Integration, 96 N.Y.U. L. Rev. __ (2021)

  • Elise Bernlohr Maizel, The Case for Downsizing the Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege, Hastings Law Journal (forthcoming)

  • Elise Bernlohr Maizel, In Re Grand Jury, Quantifying Purpose, and the “Lawyer in the Room” Problem in Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege, Yale Journal on Regulation (Mar. 19, 2023), https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/in-re-grand-jury-quantifying-purpose-and-the-lawyer-in-the-room-problem-in-corporate-attorney-client-privilege-by-elise-bernlohr-maizel/

  • G. Michael Parsons, A Powerful Tool to Take on the Supreme Court — if Democrats Use It Right, The Hill, Feb. 16, 2021

  • G. Michael Parsons, The Peril and Promise of Redistricting Reform in H.R. 1, Harvard Law Review Blog,  Feb. 2, 2021

  • G. Michael Parsons, The Price of Free Elections, 74 Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc (2021)

  • G. Michael Parsons, The Legality of Ranked-Choice Voting, 109 California Law Review (2021) (with Richard H. Pildes)

  • G. Michael Parsons, Contingent Design & The Court Reform Debate, 23 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming)

  • G. Michael Parsons, Ranked Choice Voting is Constitutional, Mass. Lawyers Weekly, Oct. 15, 2020 (with Richard H. Pildes)

  • G. Michael Parsons, Platforms, Political Advertising, and Attentional Choice, 12 Drexel L. Rev. 765 (2020)

  • G. Michael Parsons, Fighting for Attention: Democracy, Free Speech, and the Marketplace of Ideas, 104 Minnesota Law Review 2157 (2020)

  • G. Michael Parsons, Gerrymandering & Justiciability: The Political Question Doctrine After Gill v. Whitford, 95 Indiana Law Journal 1295 (2020)

  • Faraz Sanei, Reclaiming Establishment: Identity and the ‘Religious Equality Problem’, 71 U. Kans. L. Rev. __ (2022)

  • David Simson, Most Favored Racial Hierarchy: The Ever-Evolving Ways of the Supreme Court’s Superordination of Whiteness, 120 MICH. L. REV. (forthcoming 2022)
  • David Simson, Hope Dies Last: The Progressive Potential and Regressive Reality of the Antibalkanization Approach to Racial Equality, 30 WM. & Mary Bill Rts. J. (forthcoming 2022)
  • David Simson, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (with Angela Onwuachi-Willig), in CRITICAL RACE JUDGEMENTS: : REWRITTEN U.S. COURT OPINIONS ON RACE AND LAW (Devon Carbado et al., eds., 2020).
  • Jacob Victor, Reconceptualizing Compulsory Copyright Licenses, 72 Stan. L. Rev. 915 (2020)

  • Jacob Victor, Utility-Expanding Fair Use, 105 Minn. L. Rev.___ (2020)

  • Rachel J. Wechsler, Deliberating at a Crossroads: Sex Trafficking Victims' Decisions about Participating in the Criminal Justice Process, 43 Fordham Int'l L. J. 1033 (2020)