An NYU Law debate on women's issues in 2012 focuses on healthcare and reproductive rights (VIDEO)

At the February 6 event, “Sex at the Polls: Women’s Issues for 2012,” reproductive rights and the affordable healthcare act dominated the conversation. Organized by NYU Law’s Federalist Society, American Constitutional Society, Law Women and Law Democrats, the event brought Faye Wattleton, former president and CEO of Planned Parenthood, Lois Uttley, director of MergerWatch, conservative feminist scholar Christina Hoff Sommers, and feminist blogger Jill Filopovic '08 to NYU Law for a debate moderated by Cynthia Estlund, Catherine A. Rein Professor of Law.

Hoff Sommers called into question the idea that women can be treated as a single voting block. “The issues that concern women in the upcoming election are identical to the issues that concern men,” Hoff-Sommers argued. “There isn’t a women’s perspective; women are variegated.” According to Hoff-Sommers, the economy, as well as healthcare and the affordable care act, are among the most important issues at stake this fall, for both women and men.

Uttley agreed that the affordable healthcare act would be a significant issue in the upcoming election, but also stressed that it is an issue with particular importance for women. “We’ve seen insurance companies told that they cannot deny coverage to children because they have a pre-existing condition," she said, noting that in 2014 this will apply to adults as well. “And for women, traditionally some of those pre-existing conditions have included things like having once had a C-section delivery… having been raped, or having been a victim of domestic violence. Women should not be able to be denied health insurance because of those kinds of pre-existing conditions.”

When the debate turned to abortion rights, Hoff-Sommers cited polling data showing that while 34% of American women believe that abortion is morally acceptable, 51% of American women believe that abortion is morally wrong. “The nation is engaged in a contentious argument over a moral dilemma,” said Hoff Sommers, who identified herself as pro-choice. “I find it appalling that there is such a disregard for what is in fact a majority of our countrymen who view it differently, and some passionately. Rather than attack them as somehow engaged in some kind of dark conspiracy against women’s bodies, we have to understand why they hold these positions… and why it’s not going away as a moral question.” 

“Those of us who have fought very long and hard to protect that capacity to make the personal decision really should not always be cast as contentious and confrontational,” Wattleton countered. “Most of us really do understand that people do struggle with this decision. The issue is not about whether you struggle, the issue is whether the government gets to make that decision for the woman. And that’s where the heart of the matter has resided.”

Watch the full video of the event: (1 h. 28 min):


Posted February 15, 2012

Support NYU Law

We are at the forefront of legal education, and with your help we can continue the remarkable transformation that has brought us to this point.

Support NYU Law

Site Seeing

Looking for more? Try these pages:

About NYU Law
Blogs and Journals
Law School Magazine
Milbank Tweed Forum

Click to see more:
Expand